SC asks Jaiprakash Associates to deposit Rs 1,000 crore by June 15
Lawyer Anupam Lal Das, appearing for JAL, said its proposed revival plan for JIL ought to be considered afresh by the Committee of Creditors (COC). "We have proposed the best revival plan and the liquidation of JIL is neither in the interest of creditors, nor in the interest of home buyers," he said. The firm has proposed to offer 2,000 equity shares of JIL, the company facing the insolvency proceedings, to each home buyer as part of its Rs 10,000-crore proposal to revive it, he added.
The Supreme Court today asked realty firm Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) to deposit an additional Rs 1,000 crore with its Registry by June 15 to provide refunds to the hassled home buyers. On submission of this amount, the liquidation proceedings against Jaypee Infratech Limited (JIL), a subsidiary of holding company JAL, shall remain stayed, a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra said. The bench, which also comprised Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud, said if there was any default in depositing the money by June 15, the statutory proceedings against JIL, which has been facing insolvency proceedings, shall proceed. The apex court had earlier directed JAL to deposit Rs 2,000 crore with the apex court Registry. So far, the real estate firm has deposited Rs 750 crore.
Lawyer Anupam Lal Das, appearing for JAL, said its proposed revival plan for JIL ought to be considered afresh by the Committee of Creditors (COC). "We have proposed the best revival plan and the liquidation of JIL is neither in the interest of creditors, nor in the interest of home buyers," he said. The firm has proposed to offer 2,000 equity shares of JIL, the company facing the insolvency proceedings, to each home buyer as part of its Rs 10,000-crore proposal to revive it, he added. The company had sought a direction for restraining the National Company Law Tribunal (NLCT) at Allahabad from proceeding further with the insolvency proceedings.
It had also said that the handing over of the company to the "sole resolution applicant" will result in compromising the interests of home buyers, minority shareholders, employees and even the financial creditors of the company.
SIP vs SSY: Start SIP in daughter's name or invest money in Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana? Know which may give better returns
Post Office Senior Citizen Savings Scheme 2024: Get Rs 12,300 interest every quarter on Rs 6 lakh investment in this guaranteed return investment scheme
GPT Healthcare IPO allotment status: Here's how to check allotment status online on BSE, Link Intime India
National Savings Time Deposit Account (TD): How much your Rs 1 lakh investment will grow in 1, 2, 3, 5 years
PSBs' valuations still reasonable despite 162% jump in Nifty PSU Bank index in less than 2 years: Report
BJP confident PM Narendra Modi to return to power with a greater majority: Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman
The realty firm had said it was completing 500 dwelling units for delivery to the home buyers every month and urged that its representation be considered by the Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) as per law.
The court had directed its Registry that if any money was lying with it, then it could be invested in short-term fixed deposit with a nationalised bank.
It had on January 10 directed JAL, the holding firm of Jaypee Infratech Ltd (JIL), to provide details of its housing projects in the country, saying the home buyers should either get their houses or their money back.
It had refused to accord urgent hearing on a plea of the Reserve Bank of India, seeking its nod to initiate insolvency proceedings before the NCLT against JAL, saying it would be dealt with at a later stage.
The home buyers, including one Chitra Sharma, had moved the apex court, stating that around 32,000 people had booked flats and were now paying instalments.
Watch this Zee Business video
The plea had also stated that hundreds of home buyers were left in the lurch after the NCLT, on August 10 last year, admitted the IDBI Bank's plea to initiate insolvency proceedings against the debt-ridden realty firm for allegedly defaulting on a Rs 526-crore loan.