1.77 lakh restaurants under taxman's scanner; Rs 408 crore sales suppression detected—63,000 businesses asked to fix filings 

Herstory: Women Leaders who smashed the glass ceiling 

Rs 1.05 Dividend Declared: Navratna PSU stock IRFC announces second interim payout—Check details

Middle East Tensions: IndiGo London–Mumbai flight diverted to Cairo; passengers stranded for hours

NSE IPO expected by Q4, bourse focused on enhancing market participation: CEO Ashish Chauhan

Middle East War Impact: SEBI chief makes big statement on market stability

International Women’s Day: Kisan Trust organises ‘Aparajita Samman Samaroh 2026’

Maharashtra’s Big Decision on E-Bike Taxi: Government suspends temporary licences of several operators

Middle East Crude Oil Crisis: Petrol, diesel, LPG, ATF consumers in India need not worry?

ASSOCHAM and ICCC join hands to boost India–Canada business ties

The Delhi High Court has sought the Centre's response on a visually impaired man's plea that he be appointed on a group D Railways post he has qualified for but could not join as sufficient opportunity was not given to him to get his documents verified.
Justice Suresh Kumar Kait also asked the Indian Railways to be ready with its stand by the next date of hearing, January 10, or its Chief Personnel Officer will have present himself in the court that day.
The direction came on a plea by Ranjit Kumar Gupta -- an Other Backward Class (OBC) candidate who suffers from 100 per cent visual impairment -- who claimed that he was not informed in time that the verification date of his documents would be August 12, 2016. 
He has said his call letter was also uploaded on the Railway Recruitment Cell (RRC) on that day only.
As a result, he was unable to reach Kolkata where the verification was to be carried out on August 12, 2016, he has said in the petition, filed through advocate Arpit Bhargava.
Gupta's claims were denied by the RRC.
The candidate has sought that he be again issued a call letter and be appointed to the group D post for which he had qualified.
He has also sought a vigilance enquiry in the case.
Watch Zee Business Tweet Video here: 
<blockquote data-lang="en"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ZBizImpact?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ZBizImpact</a> | रंग लाई <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ZeeBusiness?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ZeeBusiness</a> की मुहिम, <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MCX?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MCX</a> और <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NCDX?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NCDX</a> ने एग्री वायदा का ट्रेडिंग टाइम एक घंटा घटाया। अब सुबह 9 बजे से शाम 5 बजे तक होगा एग्री में ट्रेड।<a href="https://twitter.com/mrituenjayj?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@mrituenjayj</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/AnilSinghviZEE?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AnilSinghviZEE</a> <a href="https://t.co/YxSk4HGTbg">pic.twitter.com/YxSk4HGTbg</a>
— Zee Business (@ZeeBusiness) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZeeBusiness/status/1078694515815432193?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 28, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>In his plea, the candidate has claimed that according to the Railway Board guidelines on exams, a second date was to be given for document verification if a candidate could not appear in the first one.
When he sought a second date, the RRC declined his request, the petition has said, adding that subsequently he had filed a complaint before the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities.
The commissioner, however, after some hearing, disposed of his complaint without giving any reasons, the petitioner has alleged.
Thereafter, he had moved the high court which in March this year had asked him to make a representation before the RRC which was directed to deal with it by passing a reasoned order.
The petitioner has claimed that RRC did not pass a reasoned order and merely rejected his representation after which he met the railway minister also, but got no relief and, therefore, he moved the high court again.
In his petition, Gupta has alleged that while other candidates who missed their respective first date for document verification were granted a second opportunity, he was not given the same benefit in violation of the Railway Board guidelines.

The Delhi High Court has sought the Centre's response on a visually impaired man's plea that he be appointed on a group D Railways post he has qualified for but could not join as sufficient opportunity was not given to him to get his documents verified.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait also asked the Indian Railways to be ready with its stand by the next date of hearing, January 10, or its Chief Personnel Officer will have present himself in the court that day.The direction came on a plea by Ranjit Kumar Gupta -- an Other Backward Class (OBC) candidate who suffers from 100 per cent visual impairment -- who claimed that he was not informed in time that the verification date of his documents would be August 12, 2016. He has said his call letter was also uploaded on the Railway Recruitment Cell (RRC) on that day only.As a result, he was unable to reach Kolkata where the verification was to be carried out on August 12, 2016, he has said in the petition, filed through advocate Arpit Bhargava.Gupta's claims were denied by the RRC.The candidate has sought that he be again issued a call letter and be appointed to the group D post for which he had qualified.He has also sought a vigilance enquiry in the case.Watch Zee Business Tweet Video here: #ZBizImpact | रंग लाई #ZeeBusiness की मुहिम, #MCX और #NCDX ने एग्री वायदा का ट्रेडिंग टाइम एक घंटा घटाया। अब सुबह 9 बजे से शाम 5 बजे तक होगा एग्री में ट्रेड।@mrituenjayj @AnilSinghviZEE pic.twitter.com/YxSk4HGTbg— Zee Business (@ZeeBusiness) December 28, 2018In his plea, the candidate has claimed that according to the Railway Board guidelines on exams, a second date was to be given for document verification if a candidate could not appear in the first one.When he sought a second date, the RRC declined his request, the petition has said, adding that subsequently he had filed a complaint before the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities.The commissioner, however, after some hearing, disposed of his complaint without giving any reasons, the petitioner has alleged.Thereafter, he had moved the high court which in March this year had asked him to make a representation before the RRC which was directed to deal with it by passing a reasoned order.The petitioner has claimed that RRC did not pass a reasoned order and merely rejected his representation after which he met the railway minister also, but got no relief and, therefore, he moved the high court again.In his petition, Gupta has alleged that while other candidates who missed their respective first date for document verification were granted a second opportunity, he was not given the same benefit in violation of the Railway Board guidelines. 

As a result, he was unable to reach Kolkata where the verification was to be carried out on August 12, 2016, he has said in the petition, filed through advocate Arpit Bhargava.

Railways jobs: HC seeks Centre&#039;s reply on plea of visually impaired man who lost out

Railways jobs: HC seeks Centre's reply on plea of visually impaired man who lost out

news-railways-jobs-hc-seeks-centres-reply-on-plea-of-visually-impaired-man-who-lost-out-78033

The Delhi High Court has sought the Centres response on a visually impaired mans plea that he be appointed on a group D Railways post he has qualified for but could not join as sufficient opportunity was not given to him to get his documents verified. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait also asked the Indian Railways to be ready with its stand by the next date of hearing, January 10, or its Chief Personnel Officer will have present himself in the court that day. The direction came on a plea by Ranjit Kumar Gupta -- an Other Backward Class (OBC) candidate who suffers from 100 per cent visual impairment -- who claimed that he was not informed in time that the verification date of his documents would be August 12, 2016.  He has said his call letter was also uploaded on the Railway Recruitment Cell (RRC) on that day only. As a result, he was unable to reach Kolkata where the verification was to be carried out on August 12, 2016, he has said in the petition, filed through advocate Arpit Bhargava. Guptas claims were denied by the RRC. The candidate has sought that he be again issued a call letter and be appointed to the group D post for which he had qualified. He has also sought a vigilance enquiry in the case. Watch Zee Business Tweet Video here:  #ZBizImpact | रंग लाई #ZeeBusiness की मुहिम, #MCX और #NCDX ने एग्री वायदा का ट्रेडिंग टाइम एक घंटा घटाया। अब सुबह 9 बजे से शाम 5 बजे तक होगा एग्री में ट्रेड।@mrituenjayj @AnilSinghviZEE pic.twitter.com/YxSk4HGTbg — Zee Business (@ZeeBusiness) December 28, 2018 In his plea, the candidate has claimed that according to the Railway Board guidelines on exams, a second date was to be given for document verification if a candidate could not appear in the first one. When he sought a second date, the RRC declined his request, the petition has said, adding that subsequently he had filed a complaint before the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities. The commissioner, however, after some hearing, disposed of his complaint without giving any reasons, the petitioner has alleged. Thereafter, he had moved the high court which in March this year had asked him to make a representation before the RRC which was directed to deal with it by passing a reasoned order. The petitioner has claimed that RRC did not pass a reasoned order and merely rejected his representation after which he met the railway minister also, but got no relief and, therefore, he moved the high court again. In his petition, Gupta has alleged that while other candidates who missed their respective first date for document verification were granted a second opportunity, he was not given the same benefit in violation of the Railway Board guidelines. 