CCI rules 3rd lesser penalty case for cartelisation in dry-cell battery market
The Competition Commission decided not to levy penalty on Panasonic Energy India Co Ltd in a cartelisation case related to the dry-cell market, invoking the Lesser Penalty provisions for the third time for the segment, a release said.
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) passed a final order imposing penalty on Panasonic Energy India Co. Limited and Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co. Limited for colluding to fix prices of zinc-carbon dry cell batteries in India, the Corporate Affairs Ministry said Thursday.
In respect of Panasonic, the CCI granted 100 per cent reduction in penalty by invoking the provisions of Section 46 of the Competition Act, 2002.
IRCTC Tourism offers 9-day Puri-Konark-Gaya-Varanasi-Ayodhra-Prayagraj tour starting at Rs 15,100 per person; catch dates, itinerary, other latest details here
Centre launches Chakshu facility allowing citizens to report suspected fraud communication: Check details
India vs England 5th Test Live Streaming: When and where to watch IND vs ENG test series match LIVE on mobile apps, TV, laptop, online
Rs 41,000 crore investment in city gas projects in Northeast, Jammu & Kashmir: Oil Minister Hardeep Singh Puri
Shark Tank India Season 3: From stressful life as CAs to entrepreneurs, how this Gurugram couple's yogamat business idea won 4-Shark deal
FM Nirmala Sitharaman asks GST officers to leverage tech to plug loopholes, better taxpayer services
Under the Section 46 of the Act, an applicant is eligible to get the penalty reduced up to 100 per cent in cartelisation cases if the entity makes a vital disclosure by submitting evidence of a cartel under Lesser Penalty norms.
The competition watchdog imposed a penalty of Rs 31.76 crore on Panasonic and Rs 85 lakh on Godrej and Boyce, according to the ministry.
The penalty on Panasonic was levied at the rate of 1.5 times of its profit for each year from January 2012 to November 2014, and on Godrej at the rate of 4 per cent of its turnover for each year from January 2012 to November 2014, the ministry said.
It, however, said that the penalty on Panasonic was waived under the Lesser Penalty Regulations of the the Competition Act, 2002.
(This article has not been edited by Zeebiz editorial team and is auto-generated from an agency feed.)
11:20 PM IST