Regulators should prevent investment firms from setting up shop in one jurisdiction to avoid stricter controls in their home state, the European Union`s markets watchdog said, as centres such as Dublin, Frankfurt and Paris vie for business.

COMMERCIAL BREAK
SCROLL TO CONTINUE READING

EU authorities are concerned about a "race to the bottom" as financial services firms shift operations after Britain leaves the bloc in 2019, amid reports businesses are being set up that are effectively no more than postal addresses to take advantage of more lenient rules in some countries.

Ireland has complained to the European Commission that it is being undercut by rival centres, Reuters reported in March.

National securities regulators should "mitigate the risk of letter-box entities and ensure that any relocation is effective", the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) said in an `opinion`, or formal guidance, on Thursday.

Regulators should ensure senior management are based in the home jurisdiction of the firm and that "board members and senior managers in the EU27 have effective decision-making powers, even where the investment firm is part of a group", ESMA said.

If regulators believe that investment firms, such as broker-dealers including the trading arms of banks, are not genuinely operating in their home jurisdiction, "this may provide grounds for not granting or withdrawing authorisation", ESMA said.

ESMA also said regulators should not design "fast-track" authorisation processes.

Financial professionals have said the speed with which they can set up in various jurisdictions has contributed to their decision-making on EU operations after Brexit.

"I think that the fast-track prohibition is targeted at the French – the AMF have offered UK-based fund managers a quick authorisation process if they move from London to Paris," said Neil Robson, a partner at law firm Katten Muchin Rosenman.

France`s AMF regulator has launched the "2WeekTicket," a fast-track pre-approval process for firms already authorised by Britain`s Financial Conduct Authority.

"ESMA is saying that a quick authorisation to leave the UK cannot be acceptable and that there are formal mandated authorisation processes that have to be followed," Robson said.

The AMF was not immediately available to comment.

Lawyers also said the guidance risked a lessening of national regulators` powers.

"Is there some form of disintegration of the (regulators`) ability to make rules in relation to their own jurisdiction, and govern their own authorisation process?” said Monica Gogna, funds lawyer at Ropes