LPG Crisis: Government assures steady LPG supply, urges public to avoid panic booking

Crude oil prices soar over 40% in 15 days since West Asia conflict; India assures no fuel crisis

PM Modi inaugurates major petroleum pipeline expansion project in Assam

Washington DC flight operations resume after 'strong odour' triggers ground stop

Hormuz Breakthrough: Indian tankers Shivalik and Nanda Devi secure safe passage amid Gulf crisis

 Indian rupee hits record low as global tensions shake currency outlook: Report

Middle East Tension: Oman attack claims two Indian lives as conflict fears grow

Dry fruit prices surge 40% in Hyderabad as West Asia conflicts disrupt supply

Global sugar prices crash as Brazil surplus shakes markets, India stays steady: ICRA

Bank Holiday Today: Are banks closed on March 14? Check the full March 2026 holiday list

Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, on Sunday continued his attack on the Centre over the framework of India-US trade deal, stating that the country is witnessing a "betrayal of Indian farmers" in the name of the pact. In an 'X' post, Gandhi asked Prime Minister Narendra Modi about the meaning of importing Distillers Dried Grains (DDG) crops from the US. He said this would mean Indian cattle would be fed distillers' grain made from Genetically Modified (GM) American corn, and questioned whether it would effectively make Indian milk production dependent on the US agricultural industry.
"We are witnessing a betrayal of India's farmers in the name of a US trade deal. I want to ask the Prime Minister a few simple questions: What exactly does importing DDG mean? Does it mean Indian cattle will be fed distillers grain made from GM American corn? Won't this effectively make our milk production dependent on the American agricultural industry?" said Rahul Gandhi.
<blockquote>US trade deal के नाम पर हम भारत के किसानों के साथ विश्वासघात होते हुए देख रहे हैं।
मैं प्रधानमंत्री से कुछ आसान सवाल पूछना चाहता हूं:
1. DDG import करने का वास्तव में क्या मतलब है? क्या इसका मतलब यह है कि भारतीय मवेशियों को GM अमेरिकी मक्का से बने distillers grain खिलाए जाएंगे?…
— Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) <a href="https://twitter.com/RahulGandhi/status/2022948075975704788?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 15, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>The Congress MP further highlighted that if imports of US GM soybean oil are allowed, what would be its impact on Indian soybean farmers in Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, and across the country? He also asked the meaning of the term "additional products", stating that whether it is a signal that, over time, there will be pressure on India to open up pulses and other crop markets to US imports.
"If we allow the import of GM soybean oil, what will happen to our soybean farmers in Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan and across the country? How will they survive yet another price shock? When you say "additional products", what exactly is included? Is this a signal that over time there will be pressure to open up pulses and other crops to American imports?" Rahul Gandhi said.
Gandhi also questioned whether India would face any pressure to soften its stance on GM crops, adding that Indian farmers deserve clear answers to these questions.
"What does removing "non-trade barriers" actually mean? Will India face pressure in the future to soften its stand on GM crops, weaken procurement, or reduce MSP and bonuses? Once this door is opened, how will we stop it from being opened wider every year? Will there be any safeguards, or will more and more crops be quietly placed on the table in every successive deal? Farmers deserve clear answers to these questions. This is not just about today. This is about the future -- are we allowing another country to establish a long-term grip over India's agricultural sector?," said Rahul Gandhi on 'X'.
Earlier on Saturday, Rahul Gandhi accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his government of misleading the country about tariff provisions in the India-US interim trade agreement, alleging that the deal would adversely affect India's cotton farmers and textile exporters.
Gandhi said that while Indian garments face an 18 per cent tariff in the United States, Bangladesh is being given a zero per cent tariff benefit on garment exports on the condition that it imports US cotton.
Questioning the policy framework, he alleged that importing US cotton would harm domestic farmers, while not importing it would harm the textile industry. He further claimed that Bangladesh was signalling a possible reduction or halt in cotton imports from India, which, he said, could worsen the situation for Indian producers.
In a post on X, the Congress MP wrote, "18% Tariff vs 0% -- Let me explain how the expert liar Prime Minister and his cabinet are spreading confusion on this issue. And how they are cheating India's cotton farmers and textile exporters through the India-US trade deal. Bangladesh is being given 0% tariff benefit on garment exports to the US -- the only condition is that they import American cotton. After the announcement of 18% tariff on Indian garments, when I raised the question in Parliament about the special concession being given to Bangladesh, the reply from a minister of the Modi government was: "If we also want the same benefit, we will have to import cotton from America." Why was this fact hidden from the country till now?"
He said that the agreement would push millions towards unemployment and economic distress. 
He also criticised the government's handling of the negotiations, stating that a deal in the national interest should have safeguarded both cotton farmers and textile exporters.
"And what kind of policy is this? Is this really any kind of choice -- or is it a trap designed to push us into a "well in front, ditch behind" situation? If we import American cotton, our own farmers will be ruined. If we don't import it, our textile industry will lag behind and get destroyed. And now Bangladesh is also giving signals that it may reduce or even stop importing cotton from India," the post read.
"The textile industry and cotton farming are the backbone of livelihood in India. Crores of people's daily bread depend on these very sectors. Attacking these sectors means pushing millions of families into the pit of unemployment and economic crisis. A visionary government that thinks in the national interest would have negotiated a deal that protects and ensures the prosperity of both cotton farmers and textile exporters. But exactly the opposite has happened -- Narendra "Surrender" Modi and his ministers have made an agreement that is likely to inflict deep damage on both sectors," the post further read.

Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, on Sunday continued his attack on the Centre over the framework of India-US trade deal, stating that the country is witnessing a "betrayal of Indian farmers" in the name of the pact. In an 'X' post, Gandhi asked Prime Minister Narendra Modi about the meaning of importing Distillers Dried Grains (DDG) crops from the US. He said this would mean Indian cattle would be fed distillers' grain made from Genetically Modified (GM) American corn, and questioned whether it would effectively make Indian milk production dependent on the US agricultural industry."We are witnessing a betrayal of India's farmers in the name of a US trade deal. I want to ask the Prime Minister a few simple questions: What exactly does importing DDG mean? Does it mean Indian cattle will be fed distillers grain made from GM American corn? Won't this effectively make our milk production dependent on the American agricultural industry?" said Rahul Gandhi.US trade deal के नाम पर हम भारत के किसानों के साथ विश्वासघात होते हुए देख रहे हैं।मैं प्रधानमंत्री से कुछ आसान सवाल पूछना चाहता हूं:1. DDG import करने का वास्तव में क्या मतलब है? क्या इसका मतलब यह है कि भारतीय मवेशियों को GM अमेरिकी मक्का से बने distillers grain खिलाए जाएंगे?…— Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) February 15, 2026The Congress MP further highlighted that if imports of US GM soybean oil are allowed, what would be its impact on Indian soybean farmers in Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, and across the country? He also asked the meaning of the term "additional products", stating that whether it is a signal that, over time, there will be pressure on India to open up pulses and other crop markets to US imports."If we allow the import of GM soybean oil, what will happen to our soybean farmers in Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan and across the country? How will they survive yet another price shock? When you say "additional products", what exactly is included? Is this a signal that over time there will be pressure to open up pulses and other crops to American imports?" Rahul Gandhi said.Gandhi also questioned whether India would face any pressure to soften its stance on GM crops, adding that Indian farmers deserve clear answers to these questions."What does removing "non-trade barriers" actually mean? Will India face pressure in the future to soften its stand on GM crops, weaken procurement, or reduce MSP and bonuses? Once this door is opened, how will we stop it from being opened wider every year? Will there be any safeguards, or will more and more crops be quietly placed on the table in every successive deal? Farmers deserve clear answers to these questions. This is not just about today. This is about the future -- are we allowing another country to establish a long-term grip over India's agricultural sector?," said Rahul Gandhi on 'X'.Earlier on Saturday, Rahul Gandhi accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his government of misleading the country about tariff provisions in the India-US interim trade agreement, alleging that the deal would adversely affect India's cotton farmers and textile exporters.Gandhi said that while Indian garments face an 18 per cent tariff in the United States, Bangladesh is being given a zero per cent tariff benefit on garment exports on the condition that it imports US cotton.Questioning the policy framework, he alleged that importing US cotton would harm domestic farmers, while not importing it would harm the textile industry. He further claimed that Bangladesh was signalling a possible reduction or halt in cotton imports from India, which, he said, could worsen the situation for Indian producers.In a post on X, the Congress MP wrote, "18% Tariff vs 0% -- Let me explain how the expert liar Prime Minister and his cabinet are spreading confusion on this issue. And how they are cheating India's cotton farmers and textile exporters through the India-US trade deal. Bangladesh is being given 0% tariff benefit on garment exports to the US -- the only condition is that they import American cotton. After the announcement of 18% tariff on Indian garments, when I raised the question in Parliament about the special concession being given to Bangladesh, the reply from a minister of the Modi government was: "If we also want the same benefit, we will have to import cotton from America." Why was this fact hidden from the country till now?"He said that the agreement would push millions towards unemployment and economic distress.He also criticised the government's handling of the negotiations, stating that a deal in the national interest should have safeguarded both cotton farmers and textile exporters."And what kind of policy is this? Is this really any kind of choice -- or is it a trap designed to push us into a "well in front, ditch behind" situation? If we import American cotton, our own farmers will be ruined. If we don't import it, our textile industry will lag behind and get destroyed. And now Bangladesh is also giving signals that it may reduce or even stop importing cotton from India," the post read."The textile industry and cotton farming are the backbone of livelihood in India. Crores of people's daily bread depend on these very sectors. Attacking these sectors means pushing millions of families into the pit of unemployment and economic crisis. A visionary government that thinks in the national interest would have negotiated a deal that protects and ensures the prosperity of both cotton farmers and textile exporters. But exactly the opposite has happened -- Narendra "Surrender" Modi and his ministers have made an agreement that is likely to inflict deep damage on both sectors," the post further read. 

Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi on Sunday continued his attack on the Centre over the framework of India-US trade deal, stating that the country is witnessing a "betrayal of Indian farmers" in the name of the pact.

Rahul Gandhi intensifies attack on Centre over US trade deal, says &quot;we are witnessing betrayal of Indian farmers&quot;

Rahul Gandhi intensifies attack on Centre over US trade deal, says "we are witnessing betrayal of Indian farmers"

news-rahul-gandhi-intensifies-attack-on-centre-over-us-trade-deal-says-we-are-witnessing-betrayal-of-indian-farmers-390470

Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, on Sunday continued his attack on the Centre over the framework of India-US trade deal, stating that the country is witnessing a betrayal of Indian farmers in the name of the pact. In an X post, Gandhi asked Prime Minister Narendra Modi about the meaning of importing Distillers Dried Grains (DDG) crops from the US. He said this would mean Indian cattle would be fed distillers grain made from Genetically Modified (GM) American corn, and questioned whether it would effectively make Indian milk production dependent on the US agricultural industry. We are witnessing a betrayal of Indias farmers in the name of a US trade deal. I want to ask the Prime Minister a few simple questions: What exactly does importing DDG mean? Does it mean Indian cattle will be fed distillers grain made from GM American corn? Wont this effectively make our milk production dependent on the American agricultural industry? said Rahul Gandhi. US trade deal के नाम पर हम भारत के किसानों के साथ विश्वासघात होते हुए देख रहे हैं। मैं प्रधानमंत्री से कुछ आसान सवाल पूछना चाहता हूं: 1. DDG import करने का वास्तव में क्या मतलब है? क्या इसका मतलब यह है कि भारतीय मवेशियों को GM अमेरिकी मक्का से बने distillers grain खिलाए जाएंगे?… — Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) February 15, 2026 The Congress MP further highlighted that if imports of US GM soybean oil are allowed, what would be its impact on Indian soybean farmers in Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, and across the country? He also asked the meaning of the term additional products, stating that whether it is a signal that, over time, there will be pressure on India to open up pulses and other crop markets to US imports. If we allow the import of GM soybean oil, what will happen to our soybean farmers in Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan and across the country? How will they survive yet another price shock? When you say additional products, what exactly is included? Is this a signal that over time there will be pressure to open up pulses and other crops to American imports? Rahul Gandhi said. Gandhi also questioned whether India would face any pressure to soften its stance on GM crops, adding that Indian farmers deserve clear answers to these questions. What does removing non-trade barriers actually mean? Will India face pressure in the future to soften its stand on GM crops, weaken procurement, or reduce MSP and bonuses? Once this door is opened, how will we stop it from being opened wider every year? Will there be any safeguards, or will more and more crops be quietly placed on the table in every successive deal? Farmers deserve clear answers to these questions. This is not just about today. This is about the future -- are we allowing another country to establish a long-term grip over Indias agricultural sector?, said Rahul Gandhi on X. Earlier on Saturday, Rahul Gandhi accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his government of misleading the country about tariff provisions in the India-US interim trade agreement, alleging that the deal would adversely affect Indias cotton farmers and textile exporters. Gandhi said that while Indian garments face an 18 per cent tariff in the United States, Bangladesh is being given a zero per cent tariff benefit on garment exports on the condition that it imports US cotton. Questioning the policy framework, he alleged that importing US cotton would harm domestic farmers, while not importing it would harm the textile industry. He further claimed that Bangladesh was signalling a possible reduction or halt in cotton imports from India, which, he said, could worsen the situation for Indian producers. In a post on X, the Congress MP wrote, 18% Tariff vs 0% -- Let me explain how the expert liar Prime Minister and his cabinet are spreading confusion on this issue. And how they are cheating Indias cotton farmers and textile exporters through the India-US trade deal. Bangladesh is being given 0% tariff benefit on garment exports to the US -- the only condition is that they import American cotton. After the announcement of 18% tariff on Indian garments, when I raised the question in Parliament about the special concession being given to Bangladesh, the reply from a minister of the Modi government was: If we also want the same benefit, we will have to import cotton from America. Why was this fact hidden from the country till now? He said that the agreement would push millions towards unemployment and economic distress. He also criticised the governments handling of the negotiations, stating that a deal in the national interest should have safeguarded both cotton farmers and textile exporters. And what kind of policy is this? Is this really any kind of choice -- or is it a trap designed to push us into a well in front, ditch behind situation? If we import American cotton, our own farmers will be ruined. If we dont import it, our textile industry will lag behind and get destroyed. And now Bangladesh is also giving signals that it may reduce or even stop importing cotton from India, the post read. The textile industry and cotton farming are the backbone of livelihood in India. Crores of peoples daily bread depend on these very sectors. Attacking these sectors means pushing millions of families into the pit of unemployment and economic crisis. A visionary government that thinks in the national interest would have negotiated a deal that protects and ensures the prosperity of both cotton farmers and textile exporters. But exactly the opposite has happened -- Narendra Surrender Modi and his ministers have made an agreement that is likely to inflict deep damage on both sectors, the post further read. 

Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi on Sunday continued his attack on the Centre over the framework of India-US trade deal, stating that the country is witnessing a betrayal of Indian farmers in the name of the pact.