&format=webp&quality=medium)
Delhi-NCR remained blanketed in a thick layer of smog on Wednesday with air quality dipping once again into the ‘very poor’ to ‘severe’ categories, showing severe pollution levels and posing serious health risks.
According to the data from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), here are some areas along with their AQI levels:
Delhi
Noida
Ghaziabad
Amid the worsening air quality, the Supreme Court on Monday asked the Delhi government to file an affidavit explaining the nature and efficiency of the AQI monitoring equipment used in the national capital, ANI reported.
A bench comprising Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and Justices Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria directed the government (GNCTD) to submit the details by the next hearing.
Senior advocate and amicus curiae Aparajita Singh informed the bench that water sprinkling was reportedly done around AQI monitoring stations, allegedly to artificially bring down pollution readings. She submitted related media reports to the court.
Appearing for the Central government, ASG Aishwarya Bhati said water sprinkling was happening across the city, adding that political parties were circulating such videos to target authorities.
The amicus also flagged that incidents of stubble burning were being undercounted, recommending that farmers be provided with equipment to manage crop residue. The Supreme Court asked the Centre to work on a long-term solution for Delhi’s persistent air pollution crisis.
The court directed the Chief Secretaries of Punjab and Haryana to ensure strict implementation of the anti-stubble burning guidelines issued by the CAQM in its November 13 report.
The petitioner was represented by senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, who stated that the deteriorating air condition in the Delhi area justified a total ban on construction activities in the city.
The court, nevertheless, took a different view claiming that the Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP) already sets limits using scientific evaluation.
The court noted:
“We do not possess the expertise to impose additional restrictions. A large chunk of the population depends on various activities for their livelihood.”
The matter will now be heard again on November 19, with the court expecting detailed responses on AQI monitoring practices and compliance with anti-pollution measures.