&format=webp&quality=medium)
India’s new GDP data for 2025-26 will be released today at 4 pm by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI). The government has updated the GDP measurement system, changing the base year from 2011–12 to 2022–23.
Economists expect FY26 growth around 7.6 per cent and Q3 expansion as high as 8.3 per cent. The new data could reshape policy decisions, sectoral weights, and India’s path to overtake Japan as the world’s fourth-largest economy, offering a clearer view of real economic expansion than earlier GDP releases.
The revision aims to give a clearer picture of the economy, capturing growth in digital businesses, the formal sector, and services.
GDP, or Gross Domestic Product, is the total value of goods and services produced in a country in a year. It is like India’s annual “income.” For example, if India produces goods and services worth Rs 300 lakh crore in a year, that is the GDP. It helps understand whether the economy is growing, if people’s incomes are rising, and whether government policies are effective.
A simple example: In a village producing wheat, milk, and handloom sarees, the total value of these products in a year is the GDP of that village. India’s GDP works on the same principle, but for the whole country.
Economists use a reference year, called the base year, to measure growth accurately. India used 2011–12 as the base year earlier. Using such an old year is like measuring a 25-year-old’s height with a ruler meant for a 10-year-old—it gives a distorted picture. The new base year 2022–23 reflects the economy after the pandemic, including digital and formal sector growth.
GDP can be expressed in nominal and real terms. Nominal GDP is the raw increase in value, while real GDP removes inflation to show actual growth. For example, if income rises from Rs 10,000 to Rs 12,000 but prices rise by 20 per cent, real income growth is minimal. The same applies to GDP. The updated base year ensures price adjustments are accurate and show real economic growth.
India’s economy has changed significantly since 2011-12. Digital payments, e-commerce platforms like Flipkart and Zomato, GST formalisation of over 1.4 crore businesses, renewable energy expansion, and a growing services sector were not fully captured earlier.
| Sector | 2011-12 Contribution | Now | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital Economy | Minimal | Significant | UPI, fintech, and e-commerce are now included |
| Formal Sector | Estimated | Accurate | GST data used |
| Renewable Energy | Low | High | Solar and wind counted |
| Services | Underreported | Properly measured | IT, healthcare, and fintech included |
2022–23 was chosen as the base year because it is the first stable post-COVID year, providing a reliable starting point.
The new GDP system uses real administrative data from GST, e-Vahan, MCA-21, and PFMS. The informal sector is now measured using the Labour Input (LI) method instead of the older Effective Labour Input (ELI) method, giving more accurate results. Real growth is calculated using double deflation, which adjusts for both input and output price changes.
Gross Value Added (GVA) measures the value each sector adds after deducting input costs. GDP equals GVA plus taxes minus subsidies. For example, a tailor buying cloth for Rs 100 and selling a shirt for Rs 250 has a GVA of Rs 150.
| Term | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| GDP | Total value of goods and services | Rs 300 lakh crore per year |
| GVA | Value added by each sector | Tailor: Rs 150 |
| Nominal GDP | Raw growth without inflation adjustment | Rs 12,000 income from Rs 10,000 |
| Real GDP | Growth adjusted for inflation | Rs 10,000 → Rs 12,000 with 20% price rise = minimal |
| Single Deflation | Adjusts output prices only | Old method |
| Double Deflation | Adjusts input and output prices | IMF recommended |
| LI Method | Counts workers using a real survey | ASUSE, PLFS |
| ELI Method | Old method using assumptions | Overestimates growth |
The GDP revision benefits citizens, policymakers, businesses, and investors. Accurate data helps target welfare, create jobs, improve tax fairness, plan government programs like PM Vishwakarma, MUDRA loans, and PM SVANidhi, and boost investor confidence. It also strengthens India’s credibility in international forums like the G20, IMF, and World Bank.
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| GDP | Total value of all goods and services produced in a year |
| Base Year | Reference year for measuring growth |
| GVA | Value each sector adds after costs |
| Deflation | Adjusting for price changes to measure real growth |
| Double Deflation | Adjusts both input and output prices |
| LI Method | Counts workers using survey data |
| ELI Method | Old assumption-based method |
| ASUSE | Survey of small businesses |
| PLFS | Labour survey |
| MoSPI | Ministry of Statistics |
| PFMS | Tracks government spending |
| e-Vahan | Vehicle registration database |
| MCA-21 | Corporate filing system |
Some myths have circulated regarding the revision. Claims that the government is manipulating numbers or inflating GDP are false. Base year revisions are standard worldwide, including in the USA, UK, EU, and Japan. India’s new method is transparent and independent, and the numbers can rise or fall. The Labour Input method for informal workers is more conservative and accurate than the old ELI method.
The last base year revision (2011–12) was implemented in 2015 under the current government. Before that, the previous government used the 2004–05 base year for 11 years. The digital infrastructure needed for an accurate revision, such as GST, MCA-21, and e-Vahan, was built in recent years.
Has India’s GDP been manipulated?
No. The measurement has been upgraded to reflect the current economy, including digital businesses, GST, and renewable energy.
How was this revision possible?
Tools like GST, MCA-21, e-Vahan, and PFMS allow real-time, accurate measurement. Earlier, such infrastructure did not exist.
How does this affect the informal sector?
Small shopkeepers, artisans, and daily wage workers are now counted accurately through surveys and worker data.
Is it normal to revise GDP?
Yes. Revisions align GDP measurement with reality, following IMF recommendations like double deflation.
What about previous GDP data?
Old data had weaknesses, undercounted informal and digital sectors, and used a single deflator. The revision corrects these gaps.