Published: 11:15 AM, Nov 14, 2025 | Updated: 11:29 AM, Nov 14, 2025
The Bombay HC has issued notice on a petition seeking CBI probe against RIL and its directors, including Mukesh Ambani, for allegedly stealing over $1.55 billion worth of natural gas from neighbouring Oil and Natural Gas Corporation's wells in the KG Basin.
Mukesh Ambani is CMD of RIL. | File photo | Image credit: PTI
The Bombay HC has issued notice on a petition seeking probe against RIL and its directors, including Mukesh Ambani, for allegedly stealing over $1.55 billion worth of natural gas from neighbouring Oil and Natural Gas Corporation's wells in the KG Basin off the coast of Andhra Pradesh.
The development follows a petition seeking CBI investigation on the matter.
Key things to know about the matter:
Add Zee Business as a Preferred Source
The petition alleges that between 2004 and 2013-14, RIL drilled its KG-D6 blocks in a manner that allowed “sideways” extraction of gas belonging to ONGC’s northern fields
The estimated value of the allegedly diverted gas is over $1.55 billion (around Rs 13,000-14,000 crore), plus about $174.9 million in interest
The petitioner has sought criminal charges against RIL and its directors for theft, fraud and criminal breach of trust
The Bombay High Court has given the CBI and Union government time until November 11, 2025, to respond
RIL argues the gas was “migratory” -- naturally crossing block boundaries -- making the extraction lawful
The company says the issue is part of an older civil–arbitral dispute, not a new controversy
Consultant DeGolyer and MacNaughton (D&M) earlier noted that gas migration did occur, though the legal implications remain contested
The High Court issuing a notice does not indicate guilt; it is only the first procedural step
The court has asked whether a full CBI probe is needed, whether an FIR should be filed, and whether any contractual seizure is warranted
If the CBI is allowed to investigate, it could signal that major resource-related disputes may involve criminal liability, not just civil claims
The case is significant due to the scale of alleged irregularity in a resource-based contract (KG-D6 gas block)
Experts believe the matter could become a landmark for questions around corporate liability, contract norms, regulatory accountability and how oil-gas block agreements operate in practice